----- Original Message ----- > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > Should there be a "recommended resolution" for Workstation? > > > > > > I've got a 1024x768 VM and I've got all kinds of weirdness from > > > gnome-software seemingly expecting a much bigger display. Maybe it's a > > > bug > > > so I filed one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141337 > > > > > > A resolution recommendation wouldn't suggest that you can't have less. > > > But > > > that if you have what's recommended, then you should have a good > > > experience > > > and not have to resize windows by default. They should just all fit in > > > the > > > recommended screen size. So I'm suggesting a burden on developers, rather > > > than a limitation on users. Maybe 1280x1024? > > > > Btw. it's not only for Workstation product but for Server too - Anaconda > > also needs at least 1024x768, otherwise some labels may overflow the screen > > etc. > > Fedora isn't installable on netbooks? It is but based on this thread, it can lead to issues in everything with GUI... From Anaconda to GNOME. And I'm not saying overflowing label saying "dora Workstat" is that big deal, just looking unprofessional. It does not happen for any Fedora products as far as I know but we hit with other RH product with very long name... Jaroslav > -- > desktop mailing list > desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
