On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 18:16 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 4 September 2014 18:04, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > And when it's not, it's unreliable at best. I hibernated last week and > > then resumed into a kernel panic.... > > Given that my laptop lasts many days when suspended on battery power, > I don't lament the missing hibernate. I think it might make things a > lot simpler to just say "not supported". Then the swap size doesn't > have to match the RAM size, which makes things a lot simpler. I agree: hibernate isn't working reliably enough on the kernel side, and the implementation has ugly side-effects (constraining swap size). The entire concept of hibernation is on the way out anyway, if I'm reading the power management tea leaves right... -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
