On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 16:19:22 +0300, > Elad Alfassa <elad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> However, "hardware accelerated graphics" shouldn't be in the minimal - >> people will still run Workstation on VM platforms where it's unavailable, >> eg. KVM/spice, we don't want them to think it's impossible to run our own >> OS on our own virtualization platform. >> I think it would make more sense for "Hardware accelerated graphics" to be >> in the recommended section. > > > If you are using software for graphics you need a powerful CPU to make the > system usable. That is an odd combination on real hardware. So I think for a > recommendation it makes sense to suggest hardware graphic acceleration for > workstation. I think the running it as a VM on one's desktop is an outlier > case. I disagree. Testing Workstation in a VM before installing it is something we should very much care about. There are also cases where people want to use a VM for developing some new part of the stack and running Workstation as a VM to test that out is also very viable. josh -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
