On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Pete Travis <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > When I was originally drafting the Hardware Requirements copy, I tried to > stay away from the minimum/recommended distinction. It isn't easy to draw a > line and say "on this side you will have a great experience, and on this > side you will have a merely functional experience, and across this other > line it probably won't run at all." I think users can generally understand > "more is better", and make an appropriate judgment based on explanation of > the factors involved and available options. Following that line of > thinking, we could say *suggest* at least 2GB of RAM, with a caveat that > less RAM might be a compromise some could find acceptable, and more RAM > would be better. > > WRT the actual figure, systems that are preconfigured with 2GB of RAM are > probably going to be mid/high Pentium 4 era systems, or low/mid range > Core2Dou era systems with i915 -ie 4 years or more out of production. A I don't think we want to encourage installing Workstation on any 32-bit platform. josh -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
