Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 23:08 +0200, Elad Alfassa wrote:
> 
> Your assumption is that we use Intel's definition of a "workstation"
> when we define the "workstation" product is simply wrong.

+1. You're playing word games, whereas it's pretty clear from the entire
thrust of the Workstation effort on all levels that the definition of
"workstation" you cite is not the one anyone involved (the WG, FESCo
etc) is using.

We could have another argument about whether Workstation is the right
word to use, but that doesn't seem like the most productive use of
anyone's time...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux