----- Original Message ----- > Hi All, > > 3) FESCo has said schedules should be kept in-sync for now. Should the > release schedule section still be included? > > This is in reference to the "The working group will also be > responsible for defining release schedule while also taking the needs > of the other working groups into consideration and the resources > available from the Fedora infrastructure team." line. > > We might consider just changing this to: > > "The working group will also be responsible for on-going feedback and > suggestions on release schedules, based on collaboration with upstream > components, the other Working Groups and FESCo, and Fedora > Infrastructure." For in-sync schedules, this would be definitely better solution. Otherwise, we have pretty nice setup how to deal with schedules. It would need more decentralization aka using git as much as possible, publishing is already handled as group (that time to make easier transition for new schedule wrangler). And for example websites are able to automatically pick up important milestones, fedocal integration etc. So I'd say even with out of sync schedules, some kind of centralized storage and process would be nice to have, even more people will be involved and I'll (or any future schedule wrangler) be ready to help. > 4) What traditional policies and rules will be modified from the > existing Fedora policies/rules? > > This is in reference to the section at the top of the PRD that says: > "Being a new product the Fedora Workstation will have its basic rules > and targets set through this PRD and thus there will be deviations > from some of the traditional policies or rules that the old Fedora > project followed. " > > FESCo has clearly and repeatedly stated that it retains oversight to > all decisions all WGs make. It might be simpler to just remove this > line. One process is Change process - other thing PGM is (was) running in the Fedora.old releases. The updated version was already created with SIGs in mind (FESCo limited it a bit). Should be easy to adjust to fit WGs but still FESCo wants some control as it was discussed on the meeting. This is a bit out of scope of Workstation WG only but I'd like to hear opinions from all WGs, how they feel about it, what they would like to see etc. Jaroslav > josh > -- > desktop mailing list > desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
