On 24 January 2014 10:54, Christian Schaller <cschalle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My take away from the discussion so far is that the current board would not accept > anything that 'automates' access to such external software. Doesn't matter if we ship > the metadata on the ISO or not. Did they define 'automates'? Is there a required level of pain that we have to make the user go through? At the moment it's just "type chrome into google; click an rpm; input your password". I don't see how that's any harder than "type a chrome into the software center; click install; agree to the EULA; input your password". > The only thing that I can see flying with the current board is a system that is 'blind' to what it is offering, just like > a web browser. So perhaps when the user clicks install, it just opens the browser to something like https://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/browser/ ? -- that's perfectly doable right now, but the UX would be pretty, well, unusual. Richard. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
