On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:21 AM, drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:09 AM, drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>>> FYI, there will be a Board meeting today at 19:00 UTC in >>>>>>> #fedora-meeting-1 on freenode to discuss the 3rd party repo ticket >>>>>>> that was submitted. Please join if you can. >>>>>> >>>>>> Second time I've read about this ticket, and haven't seen a URL yet. >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you send the link? >>>>> >>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/board/ticket/169 however the Board trac >>>>> instance is private and you will not be able to read it. >>>> >>>> What? Why? This somehow contradicts the openness Fedora stands for ... >>> >>> This is not a new development. The Board trac instance has been >>> private since it was created. The Board at times deals with legal >>> issues of a sensitive nature that cannot be discussed in public. >> >> OK fair enough but can't this sensitive tickets (like legal ones) be >> marked as private (not sure if trac allows that like you can do in >> bugzilla) and leave >> other ones like this one public? > > No. Trac is horrible and doesn't let you do that. This has been > suggested already. As Stephen pointed out, it might be worth looking > again at upstream trac but that would still require a new rollout of > trac before it could happen. OK. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
