On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01/23/2014 09:09 AM, drago01 wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Josh Boyer >> <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Bastien Nocera >>> <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> FYI, there will be a Board meeting today at 19:00 UTC in >>>>> #fedora-meeting-1 on freenode to discuss the 3rd party repo >>>>> ticket that was submitted. Please join if you can. >>>> >>>> Second time I've read about this ticket, and haven't seen a URL >>>> yet. >>>> >>>> Could you send the link? >>> >>> https://fedorahosted.org/board/ticket/169 however the Board trac >>> instance is private and you will not be able to read it. >> >> What? Why? This somehow contradicts the openness Fedora stands for >> ... >> > > See the last paragraph here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board#Contact > > In short, this probably shouldn't have been filed as a ticket in the > first place, since the Trac instance exists solely for managing > sensitive topics (such as legal issues). That's incorrect. The existence of a ticket can be used for tracking purposes while the discussion of an item can be directed to advisory-board. Tickets exist because they are issues that need to be solved. Expecting the Board to do all of its issue tracking without a tool that helps with issue tracking is an unrealistic expectation. josh -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
