Re: Workstation product kernel requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]




----- Original Message -----
> On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 08:51 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> 
> > We do have influence to a degree, but it's in areas other than new
> > feature/code development.  Dave is doing awesome things with Trinity
> > and Coverity.  Justin is working really hard on automated testing and
> > QA.  Though yes, we'd really like to start doing more upstream work.
> 
> Havin a set of automated test cases that cover areas of kernel
> functionality that are of interest to desktop-y uses would be awesome.
> 
> As for wishlist items: Having a union fs in the kernel would really help
> with application sandboxing. But I don't think that is an item for the
> Fedora kernel team...

That was the overlayfs mentioned in my original reply.
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux