On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 05:21:57PM -0400, Christian Schaller wrote: > I assume it might breach some packaging policy, but why not have a > 'desktop' rpm which requires all other packages we consider part of the > desktop for a given release? That way when we add new applications like > this we just add it as a dependency of the desktop package? I can't actually find or recall such a policy. I looked, but the last I could find was a 2009 conversation which ended in the comps format being rewritten, which solved the specific problem without answering the general question. We certainly do have some "meta-packages" like that -- for example from the top of my head, xorg-x11-drivers, and good 'ol redhat-lsb. Your idea seems to fit along the same lines as redhat-lsb. If we do this, does the %packages list for the spin just become that one file? -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
