Re: [Design-team] Different Backgrounds for the Lock Screen vs the desktop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 14:13 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 09/17/2013 02:01 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> 
> > I think you missed the part of the thread where I mentioned how the current behaviour was necessary.
> > 
> > Installing and *enabling* extensions by default in Fedora, and deviating from upstream isn't something we'd consider.
> 
> I thought FESCO had made it clear that desktop SIG does not have full
> control over the defaults 
> ( which is why I went ahead and created Gnome SIG as in so it could be
> as upstream wanted it to be heck we could even default to btrfs and
> disable lvm and all the other generic useless stuff
> rsyslog,sendmail,cron etc we ship and enable by default )

You created a gnome sig ? Thats fascinating, but about as useful as me
creating a server sig. Who is in it ? What does it do ?

-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux