On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 13:36 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Bastien Nocera (bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 11:03 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > > On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 15:18 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > > As part of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ReworkPackageGroups, I've > > > > been working on redoing some of the groups that make up installation choices > > > > in anaconda. The idea is to offer a simpler interface, where the user simply > > > > selects which environment they want to run in, plus options for that > > > > environment. > > > > > > > > Based on what's in the kickstart file for the Desktop spin, here's what I > > > > have for the Desktop: > > > > > > NetworkManager-gnome is dead, having been replaced by both > > > network-manager-applet and nm-connection-editor, among others. At this > > > point, the Shell is functional enough that we don't need > > > network-manager-applet anymore for GNOME desktops. But we still need > > > nm-connection-editor. > > > > We'll need it until we can get rid of fallback :( > > OK, I will make the appropriate substitutions. As an aside: > > *NetworkManager*{-glib,-openvpn,-vpnc,etc.} > *network-manager*-applet > *nm*-connection-editor > > Not saying we need 100% consistency, but a little might be nice. Would be nice, and I tried to create "NetworkManager-applet" repos on gnome.org when we moved the git repos there a few years ago, but for whatever @%#%@# reason gnome.org has a policy of refusing StudlyCaps repo names. So I had to name the repo network-manager-applet. And since our package names follow our tarball names... Dan -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
