"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johannbg@xxxxxxxxx) said: > On 11/29/2011 04:50 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > rpm -e --nodeps > > > > (when in doubt, try the obvious thing.) > > Perhaps your solution to solve all your problems is with "rpm -e > --nodeps $foo" then eat what breaks for breakfast but rpm -e --nodeps > is not something I can recommend to novice end users not even as a > workaround around for this nor is this something would ever propose to them. The query was '[your] gnome-shell', not any random novice user. There are a variety of solutions that are appropriate for a short term local fix that aren't relevant for wider distribution. (There was one in the referenced bug as well.) In any case, if your reaction to a single unintentional bug in one upstream component is to wax profoundly about upstream project directions and the future of the desktop... step back from the computer and take a few deep breaths. As much fun as rousing the rabble might be. (Well, two unrelated bugs, but still...) Bill -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
