On Mon, 19.09.11 18:37, Matthias Clasen (mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 20:58 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > Maybe except for the fact that > > Fedora appears willing to ignore the issues that previously > > mattered. > > It is not a Fedora issue, really. GNOME is moving to depend on tracker. > Letting it linger as an optional dependency for another few years is > realistically not going help things along. Do you have any better idea > for how to make progress on getting the necessary infrastructure fixes > in place, other than using the stuff ? Work with Eric to get fanotify fixed up for unprivileged use. fanotify is already in the kernel, so the big changes have been made. It's just a matter of building on that, and Eric is a very responsive and friendly person. The privilege issues could probably be dealt with in a minimal way already by simply adding some kind of tail-drop logic to the fanotify queues. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
