On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Well, I mean, I think just about _all_ bugs of this kind are going to be > hardware-specific somehow. Unfortunately not, see for example: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=642367 I can also imagine missing or superfluous packages being a problem (remember our upgrade mechanisms are currently defined to by default not pull in new packages from the OS base, or remove old ones we don't want). > The only way that wouldn't be the case is if > the fallback mechanism were somehow utterly and completely broken in > implementation; once you've written a fallback mechanism that at least > theoretically does what it's supposed to do, all bugs are 'corner > cases', yes? I'm fine with the non-hardware bugs being individual, I don't think we need a tracker. So I'll just retitle and comment in the current one to make things more clear. Thanks! -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
