On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Martin Sourada <martin.sourada@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 12:43 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:32:54 -0500, >> Charles Kerr <charles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > I don't have much experience with pngout, but it claims to be able to >> > shave an extra 14% off these images' sizes. I tried it out on the >> > four images in standard/ and got this result: >> >> While better lossless compression would be a good thing to be doing for >> all of the artwork, I don't think that is going to help enough here. >> Given the short amount of time, I don't think this approach (assuming it >> was expanded to include a larger set of artwork) is going to be practical >> as an immediate solution. > Once, we used optipng for that, but the savings really aren't that much > (depending on picture, about 10%) plus they're time-intensive. 10% is a rather nice improvement ... "plus they're time-intensive" That doesn't matter the extra time is *buildtime* not actual runtime. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
