On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 16:44 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 01:19:52PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 16:07 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, if we want to ship one, gwibber is pretty much the only option, > > > > since it's most likely too late to fix pino before F14 is released. The > > > > big cons about gwibber, in my opinion is the fairly poor performance > > > > I've experienced with it (tho I last used it about 2 months ago) and the > > > > number of dependencies it would pull into the livecd. > > > > > > Doesn't post-Beta seem too late to do this? Better to have people > > > simply use their browser I'd think. > > > > well, we have to make *some* kind of post-beta change here, since as I > > said the current situation blocks the release. I don't think subbing in > > gwibber for pino is a particularly scary change, all we'd have to check > > is if it goes over the size limit, and if it works, which is about half > > an hour of effort. > > Right, the uncertainty I have is really around the functionality of > the new suggested default client, as opposed to "let's not do > anything." My preference would be a simple removal of pino for no > other reason than least disturbance of the Force. I agree that removing pino, together with a suitable note in the release notes, is the safest route at this point. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
