On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 16:07 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > Yeah, if we want to ship one, gwibber is pretty much the only option, > > since it's most likely too late to fix pino before F14 is released. The > > big cons about gwibber, in my opinion is the fairly poor performance > > I've experienced with it (tho I last used it about 2 months ago) and the > > number of dependencies it would pull into the livecd. > > Doesn't post-Beta seem too late to do this? Better to have people > simply use their browser I'd think. well, we have to make *some* kind of post-beta change here, since as I said the current situation blocks the release. I don't think subbing in gwibber for pino is a particularly scary change, all we'd have to check is if it goes over the size limit, and if it works, which is about half an hour of effort. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
