On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 01:19:52PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 16:07 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: >> >> > > Yeah, if we want to ship one, gwibber is pretty much the only option, >> > > since it's most likely too late to fix pino before F14 is released. The >> > > big cons about gwibber, in my opinion is the fairly poor performance >> > > I've experienced with it (tho I last used it about 2 months ago) and the >> > > number of dependencies it would pull into the livecd. >> > >> > Doesn't post-Beta seem too late to do this? Better to have people >> > simply use their browser I'd think. >> >> well, we have to make *some* kind of post-beta change here, since as I >> said the current situation blocks the release. I don't think subbing in >> gwibber for pino is a particularly scary change, all we'd have to check >> is if it goes over the size limit, and if it works, which is about half >> an hour of effort. > > Right, the uncertainty I have is really around the functionality of > the new suggested default client, as opposed to "let's not do > anything." My preference would be a simple removal of pino for no > other reason than least disturbance of the Force. I am not sure that this is a good idea, we found that a certain app isn't working and we have a suitable replacement so we should opt for using the later rather than *nothing*. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
