On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 8/21/10 11:10 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> On Fri, 20.08.10 09:24, Adam Williamson (awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 00:05 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>>> [1] We wrote C replacements for all remaining shell scripts in the >>>> boot >>>> and in shutdown, with the exception of LVM, DM, iSCSI and NFS stuff, >>>> which are shell orgies. But then again, neither of these features >>>> really >>>> matter for laptops where fast booting is most important >>> >>> Fedora uses LVMs by default, so anyone who installs Fedora on a laptop >>> and doesn't customize the partition scheme will have them. >> >> Well, I believe Fedora should not do this by default. This just adds >> complexity, makes boot slower, and offers exactly zero advantages for >> laptop/desktop users. Also, sooner or later LVM will be obsoleted anyway >> by btrfs which integrates most of the LVM features into the fs >> itself. And in contrast to LVM the btrfs userspace is kinda nice. >> >> Lennart >> > > I've got no issues with not doing LVM by default here... I think its needed for LUKS (unfortunately) but I would like to see it non used for the other use cases. Peter -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
