On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 12:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 13:50 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 12:27 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 04:15:48PM +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 00:18 +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > > > > >> More user visible things to check about current status: multi touch, > > > > > > > > > > I don't think this is going to be user visible until GTK+ / Qt get > > > > > support, and that's not likely for F14 (especially since we're not > > > > > taking GTK+ 3). > > > > > > > > So it seems we are being beaten to "first" here: > > > > http://lwn.net/Articles/400455/ > > > > > > First to rush in with a not-upstream set of extensions? Perhaps. > > > >From reading the article, looks to me like Peter Hutterer &co. are > > > working on an upstream implementation that's more sustainable. > > > > Careful there. We shipped DRI2 before it was really baked upstream. > > 'Before it was baked upstream' is rather different from 'a completely > different and incompatible implementation from the one upstream is > already working on. Hosted in launchpad.' though. Seems like I spoke too soon (me? never!) - now I look at xorg-devel archives, they seem to be handling this one rather decently. Ain't that nice. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
