On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 16:55 +0100, pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 16:46 +0100, pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Hi, folks. Just a question - since GNOME 3 is being delayed and won't > >> > ship in F14, does it make sense to have a few apps (but not many) ported > >> > to GTK+ 3 for F14? I can see it causing more trouble along the lines of > >> > the gnome-python2-desktop package. Would it be better to move them back > >> > to GTK+ 2 and postpone porting to GTK+ 3 until F15? What's the plan in > >> > general for backing off from 2.90.x versions of GNOME bits? Thanks! > >> > >> With the disabling of gnome-python2-evince the sugar team has an issue > >> with our sugar-read package which depends on it. > > > > Yeah, I noticed that, but I didn't see any good option to avoid it; if > > we don't rebuild g-p2-d and disable evince, it won't work *at all*, > > since it'll still be built against py2.6 :/ > > I can cope in the short term. As long as its fixed eventually before release! I don't think you'll see a fixed version for F14. Somebody is going to have to bite the bullet and port the application as it should be. Not knowing the details, I'm afraid I can't give a more precise help, but whether it's broken now or in 6 months, somebody will have to do the work... -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
