On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 16:46 +0100, pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, folks. Just a question - since GNOME 3 is being delayed and won't > > ship in F14, does it make sense to have a few apps (but not many) ported > > to GTK+ 3 for F14? I can see it causing more trouble along the lines of > > the gnome-python2-desktop package. Would it be better to move them back > > to GTK+ 2 and postpone porting to GTK+ 3 until F15? What's the plan in > > general for backing off from 2.90.x versions of GNOME bits? Thanks! > > With the disabling of gnome-python2-evince the sugar team has an issue > with our sugar-read package which depends on it. Yeah, I noticed that, but I didn't see any good option to avoid it; if we don't rebuild g-p2-d and disable evince, it won't work *at all*, since it'll still be built against py2.6 :/ -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
