On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 08:52 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 18:16 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > I can go ahead and package it if you need it that badly. Should I? > > It would certainly help me. > > > I thought it would be best to wait for upstream to clean it up though. > > If you think the current state of affairs is unacceptable, you could > submit a patch to make things better. Waiting for somebody else is > rarely a winning position in FOSS... > > > Hacking around the problem might not pass a review? > > Shotwell had a similar setup when it was first packaged. I don't think > 'upstream doesn't do everything perfectly to our liking' is a valid > reason to reject a package. Of course, you might end up with a more > picky reviewer than me... > hello, > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=10508 The link speaks for itself :) It isn't building on F-12 yet, exiv2 needs to be updated[1]. I've built it for F-14 and F-13 in the meantime regards, Ankur [1] > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2261133&name=build.log&offset=-2000 -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
