On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 08:52 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 18:16 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > I can go ahead and package it if you need it that badly. Should I? > > It would certainly help me. > > > I thought it would be best to wait for upstream to clean it up though. > > If you think the current state of affairs is unacceptable, you could > submit a patch to make things better. Waiting for somebody else is > rarely a winning position in FOSS... > > > Hacking around the problem might not pass a review? > > Shotwell had a similar setup when it was first packaged. I don't think > 'upstream doesn't do everything perfectly to our liking' is a valid > reason to reject a package. Of course, you might end up with a more > picky reviewer than me... > hi, review request: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599097 > regards, Ankur -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
