On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Seth Vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: >>> And we can address part of the 'update frequency' problem client-side, >>> by only checking for new updates once a week. >>> >>> But one problem which we cannot address client-side, and for which 'do >>> nothing now and reassess later' will not help at all is the amount of >>> updates. Even if you only check once per week, the flood of pointless >>> updates is a problem. That is that part of the problem that we need to >>> address with Jon's 'establishing norms or rules to limit changes'. >>> >> >> sure - but establishing that policy would be in the hands of fesco, >> wouldn't it? > > Approving and enforcing, yes. Coming up with the policy... maybe? There's > no reason others can't bring a policy to FESCo for debate and approval. Sorry - when I say 'establishing' I mean 'making into a rule' - not the proposal itself. proposals can come from whereever. -sv -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
