Re: Updates next steps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Seth Vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > And we can address part of the 'update frequency' problem client-side,
> > by only checking for new updates once a week.
> >
> > But one problem which we cannot address client-side, and for which 'do
> > nothing now and reassess later' will not help at all is the amount of
> > updates. Even if you only check once per week, the flood of pointless
> > updates is a problem. That is that part of the problem that we need to
> > address with Jon's 'establishing norms or rules to limit changes'.
> >
> 
> sure - but establishing that policy would be in the hands of fesco, 
> wouldn't it?

Approving and enforcing, yes. Coming up with the policy... maybe? There's
no reason others can't bring a policy to FESCo for debate and approval.

(This is not to disagree with you ... interested people certainly should
run for FESCo.)

Bill
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux