Re: Updates next steps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 04/23/2010 10:45 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 10:33 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>    
>> Is it possible for each SIG/yum group to have full control on it's own
>> update policy which they can adjust to their target audience instead of
>> trying to provide a solution that might not fit everybody?
>>
>>      
> These kinds of split setups don't really work, because dependencies will
> make a big mess out of it and cause you to get most of the update flood
> after a while, even if you only want security updates.
>
>    

Then that's a technical problem that needs to be solved first if 
consensus is going to be reach within the whole community and this be 
discussed on only one SIG mailing list.

If that's not possible then Rel-Eng should sit down with representatives 
from all SIG's and QA where the update policy is decide for the whole 
community then the result of that or those meetings will be posted and 
the community informed that what's going to be put for trial and 
adjusted as needed.

JBG
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux