On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 15:53 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 21:34 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > > 5717 is still a lot less than 6597 (2.28.0-1) and this is the source of > > bugs like this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573811 > > Yeah, symlinks are relatively easy to put back. But if the target went > missing, there's not much I can do. And yes, this cleanup effort > unfortunately landed very late in the 2.30 cycle, and has affected not > just your apps, but GNOME as well. On this topic, remember that during the release criteria discussion at FUDCon, desktop team agreed for this to be a criterion: "All Applications listed in the desktop menus must have icons which have a consistent appearance and sufficiently high resolution to not appear blurry" Consequently, that's in the Final release criteria: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Final_Release_Criteria which means that if it's not met, the release doesn't go out. So, um, if this has introduced any cases of missing icons in the system menus, that will need to be fixed ASAP. On a quick scan through my menus I don't immediately see any missing icons for apps that would be installed by default, but I just thought I'd mention it. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
