On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:45:19AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Luke Macken (lmacken@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > I think instead of trying to replace Gwibber, we should take a good hard > > look at their (Ubuntu's) desktop-couch vision, and really see if it is > > something we want to leverage (as they are putting a lot of resources > > into it). If not, we should patch this requirement out of Gwibber, > > because afaik, it isn't using the couchdb for anything at the moment. > > AIUI, it's using it as its storage backend (for downloaded feed > data, feed info, etc.). So it's not something that can really be > patched out as-is. Yep, you're right, it is being used. The storage.py in gwibber has a CouchMessageStore class that is set to the 'MessageStore'. It seems like it would be fairly simple to monkeypatch a new backend. However, if "erlang on the desktop" is The Future, then we may want to get an adoption plan together. luke -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
