On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:04:04AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 06:48:34AM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 04/06/2010 05:00 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > >> > > >> But, compared to gwibber, this seems to be a much better choice for our > > >> livecd. So, a (weak) +1 from me... > > > > > > Thanks. I have forwarded this feedback to the upstream developer of > > > Pino and will file tickets if required. Meanwhile I have become > > > co-maintainer of Pino in Fedora and will push forward updates as > > > necessary. Any further comments from others on including Pino by > > > default? > > > > Does Pino plan to add other social media sites like Facebook? That's > > one reason that I use Gwibber... Other than the UI issues I don't see > > any reason not to include Pino by default, although if we have to > > downsize the Live media back to CD size I wouldn't worry about keeping > > Pino. > > My sentiments too, more or less. I'm disappointed that > Status.net/identi.ca isn't supported out of the box by Pino, which > weakens my support somewhat. Yeah, the lack of identi.ca & facebook support weakens my support as well. I think instead of trying to replace Gwibber, we should take a good hard look at their (Ubuntu's) desktop-couch vision, and really see if it is something we want to leverage (as they are putting a lot of resources into it). If not, we should patch this requirement out of Gwibber, because afaik, it isn't using the couchdb for anything at the moment. luke -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
