On 08/06/2009 09:27 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Toshio Kuratomi (a.badger@xxxxxxxxx) said: >> But I think this line of discussion isn't as productive as discussion >> about splitting the two targets of the current desktop spin and what the >> requirements might be for having a successful demo-spin. Is openoffice >> a requirement for that audience? > > Well, I think this thread has conflated a few issues by now: > > - should the desktop spin be limited to a single CD in size? > - should the desktop spin have best of breed apps for any demo-able > use cases? > - should we highlight these on fp.o, instead of doing a spin? > > There's probably some others that I've missed. But until we > answer the first, we can't really logically work on the second, > I think. > The answer to the first is another set of questions: - Do we still have areas of the world where a livecd will work in a computer but either burning or booting from livedvds or liveusb is infeasible? - Do we still want the desktop spin to be the default download option on get-fedora? As long as those two hold true, the desktop spin must be limited to a single CD in size. Note that the first of those questions needs to be addressed to a wider audience than the desktop team but the second is within the desktop team's control. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
