On 08/06/2009 08:26 AM, Nicu Buculei wrote: > On 08/06/2009 05:54 PM, Matej Cepl wrote: >> >> I know and I am not fighting for OOo inclusion, just showing that we >> don't follow "make the most useful and shiny apps available" logic >> already. > > OOo is so big so it is an exception, is it or *several* other > applications, making the choice easier. > > ...and it can be argued OOo is not "cool", is "useful", you do with it > mostly boring stuff. It is also not integrated well in the desktop and > so on. > And two other arguments, one mine, the other from Jesse: * The two main use OOo apps have replacements that are good and very good (abiword, gnumeric). * OOo, like firefox, is equally promoted on windows. So it's not a Linux-specific showcase item. But I think this line of discussion isn't as productive as discussion about splitting the two targets of the current desktop spin and what the requirements might be for having a successful demo-spin. Is openoffice a requirement for that audience? -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
