On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:40 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: > On 06/06/2009 05:19 AM, William Jon McCann wrote: > > But what should that be? From a quick look at the (possibly out of > > date) gnome-scan web page it seems to me that it is trying to be an > > application. That approach may have similar problems to those of > > sound-juicer. Basically this is somewhat hard to solve if we don't > > have a rhythmbox for photos... unless we do something like the > > screenshot tool where we offer a few fixed options: > > 1. Save to Photos > > 2. Upload to Flickr > > 3. Upload to Picasa > > 4. Save as PDF > > The operations I do the most are: > 1. send the image by mail (but I prefer to save first so I can send more > than one file in each email); Some nautilus-sendto integration would be in order then. I did this for Evolution, so you can right-click on attachments and have them sent via Bluetooth, or another person straight away, without having to save them first on the hard disk. > 2. edit the image with GIMP. That's a given. > I don't think is a good idea for us to promote by default the usage of > proprietary services (flickr, picasaweb). Maybe by default we should > offer uploading by sftp and to gallelry2 and flickr and picasaweb be > installable plug-ins. It's pretty much the same architecture. We should be using Conduit for this (Conduit ships with a Totem plugin that allows you to upload the currently playing video to Youtube, without going through a web browser, or another application). > > Incidentally whatever we do we should do the same for cameras... > > Cameras have a different usage pattern, usually you download from the > camera a large amount of images and do something with them (selection, > cropping) before publishing. Red-eye removal, people tagging, keyword tagging... Different usage pattern. -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
