On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 18:01 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote: > Ironically enough Red Hat spends a lot on resources thinking about > problems like these and developing technologies like SELinux (for > confining processes) and D-Bus (for privilege seperation) to make our > software secure. It's too bad we're not doing a good job of actually > applying this in products like Fedora. Isn't that because Fedora is all about the Upstream, and Upstreams just aren't interested in sweeping changes for adding security levels like these? (soooo not helping) -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
