On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 10:03 -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 13:24 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote: > > On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 14:48:01 -0500, Colin Walters scripst: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I tossed up a Feature page for Fx3: > > > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureFirefox3 > > > > > > I put my and Chris' name on it. Tentatively thinking of making a branch > > > in CVS where we could collaborate on it and do koji scratch builds from; > > > any opinions on that? > > > > That it is useless IMHO -- FF3 is very high on the Chris' and Martin's > > TODO list. > > Having the feature is useless? Or a branch? > > The reason I created it is because it isn't actually as trivial as just > changing everything to XulRunner and updating the Firefox package - we > do ship Firefox extensions (at least in Mugshot, perhaps elsewhere) and > plugins (e.g. Totem) that will require testing and possibly porting. > Actually I know Mugshot will need a bit of porting to pick up the new > cookie file format (http://bugzilla.mugshot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1307). Plugins should "just work". They should work for both XulRunner-based apps and FF3 once compiled against XulRunner. Otherwise porting to XulRunner is a bit pointless... Totem in rawhide is already compiled against XulRunner. It's just the extensions that would have problems. -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
