On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 11:34 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 18.09.2007 10:35, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > 2) When important things in the desktop start requiring fuse everyone > > will be in the fuse group anyway, meaning any security is lost. > > (One could say this only happens on "desktop" machines, but if you > > don't trust fuse userspace on your server, just don't install it > > there.) > > No offense, but well, if "important things in the desktop start > requiring fuse" I suppose people programming that stuff first make sure > it's safe and wise to use fuse, as it might backfire to their apps if > fuse is unsafe. I had no idea that Fedora was doing this to its fuse packaging when designing gvfs. I've looked into fuse a bit, and it seemed safe to me. > It's likely nothing more then asking the Fedora developers "can we get > rid of the add-to-a-specific-group stuff for fuse over the next few > months? I want to use fuse for important things in the desktop" *before* > starting to really depend on fuse. Yeah. -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
