Re: More low hanging fruit.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]





On 8/24/07, Jon Nettleton <jon.nettleton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 8/24/07, Gian Paolo Mureddu <gmureddu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ray Strode escribió:
> >
> > Seems like a good idea to me.  At a minimum we should get rid of the
> > getty on tty1 so we don't have the brief "Login: " flash when the screen
> > jumps from rhgb to gdm.
> >
> > --Ray
> >
> >
>
> When will Fedora drop RHGB once and for all? Seems all that's needed is
> already into the kernel or easily configured into it... Albeit the
> current mode setting is rather manual, but we could simply go with
> something standard such as 1024x768@32bpp, or is this value going to
> directly feed X resolution information? For in that case, why not make X
> and VT configuration part of either: boot loader (LiveCD) or Anaconda
> (DVD) for installation, just "like in the old days", I don't see why
> both resolution values have to be tied together or identical in any way...
>
I almost have a working configuration that allows rhgb to use the gdm
xserver.  This
means that once X starts ( even earlier than with rhgb now ) it is a
seamless X transition
all the way to login.  I also have it doing cool things like instead
of bouncing back to
a VT for manual fsck it all happens right there in the rhgb vte screen.

It isn't perfect yet but I am trying to get it usable enough to make
it into Fedora 8 feature set.

ok but feature freeze  is in 4 days... will it be ready by then?


-- 
Fedora-desktop-list mailing list
Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux