On 6/13/07, Jonathan Blandford <jrb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It was a conscious design decision for evince to not appear in the menus.
I realize.... but my point is if its not going to appear in the menus... it shouldn't appear in bigboards dynamic 'popular' application list that the user sees either. Don't complicate this by wrapping another layer of catergorization over NoDisplay. NoDisplay as a tag in the desktop file does exact the job its suppose to do. BigBoard needs to honor the design choices the same way the static menus do. Either an app should be displayed to the user as a stand alone applicarion.. or it shouldn't... it doesn't matter if its bigboards dynamic interface or the menu's static listing. Bending over backwards to get evince displayed in bigboard as a special exception to the NoDisplay rule but not in the static menus makes no sense what-so-ever. If it was a design choice to hide it... hide it...and stand up behind that original design choice. -jef"This is only a hypothetical argument, since Colin only suggested that showing evince in bigboard's listing was a goal and there's been no affirmation that this was indeed a goal. If this were an actual argument, oxygen masks would drop from the ceiling in front of you and emergency lighting would lead you to the nearest bottle of tequila."spaleta -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
