On 18/04/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Arthur Pemberton wrote: > +1 this seems deserving of answer. I like Fedora, use it all the time, > and so rarely need a liveCD. And I am finding it harder to suggest > Fedora to newbies. The LiveCD doesn't seem like that's going to > change. I''m simply not suggesting any Linux since I'm only familiar > with Fedora. The LiveCD certainly has a cool factor. But in the > hypothetical scenario of a perfect LiveCD, what are the benefits? What > are the hypothetical use cases of said perfect Live Fedora? Live CD is useful since it is a single disk that you can distribute and get a reasonably good GNOME and KDE desktop. Perfect? no, but it is definitely getting better with every version overall. Rahul
What does it provide that Knoppix/Slax does not? Or is RH doing this "because they can"? Dotan Cohen http://lyricslist.com/lyrics/artist_albums/603/a-camp.html http://what-is-what.com/what_is/unix.html -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
