David Nielsen wrote:
The main point of the icon-naming side of the tango push is to make it
a more feasible task to do a complete set of icons, by reducing the
overall number of icons
Great, now when does Firefox, Thunderbird, The GIMP, Gaim and
OpenOffice.org plan to support this scheme? Before they do (and I have
no doubt that they will eventually but it might take years) this is
still a perfectly valid concern, especially since all but one of those
apps are in our default desktop.
It is a valid concern, yes but forcing one theme style is not the way to
move ahead. It is very important that themes should be easily
replaceable all across the desktop environment and applications. If not,
thats a bug and should not used as a argument to adopt one theme.
I fully support the naming effort but it's not there yet so we need to
be careful, we should also leverage the great work that has already been
done by some of the FLOSS communitys finest artists, not to mention the
large team they have already built to work on the Tango project.
If the Fedora art team wants to move ahead and adopt a different style,
they should be encouraged and allowed to do that.
Rahul
--
Fedora-desktop-list mailing list
Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
