On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 07:31 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 07:04 +0200, David Nielsen wrote: > > man, 14 08 2006 kl. 20:23 -0400, skrev Bill Nottingham: > > > > > Use NetworkManager. (Yes, I'm a broken record here.) > > > > > > Bill > > > > Pretty much Bill, so pray tell us when exactly will NM be ready for > > default deployment in Fedora like say OpenSuSE/SLED does. Untill that > > SUSE doesn't have that many custom patches for NetworkManager, they > pretty much ship a stock version. So the base functionality isn't the This should read "So the base functionality _is_ the same". > same. What they have chosen to do is just flip the switch, turn it on > by default, and people then live with it or turn it off. > > They just flipped the switch, and seem to be doing fine so far. [1] > > Dan > > [1] That doesn't mean it would be fine for us, of course. But it's a > data point. > > > glorious day these concerns are perfectly valid and a perfect indicator > > as to just how much we need a fully functional NM implementation > > suitable for the core Fedora use cases. > > > > - David Nielsen > > > -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list