fre, 12.11.2004 kl. 16.45 skrev seth vidal: > > I understand your point (and i have no problems with it *myself*), but > > if my manager came to me complaining about "hey! That new Linux-thingy, > > you installed, it popped up "penis" on my projector, while i was > > presenting our might-be new customers a new product!" and i never even > > had thought of the posibility - i would have been bloody damn embarassed > > and angry. > > > > So you're kowtowing to a purely hypothetical, corporate, prurient > interest? > No, i am not. On my *personal* desktop i would not have any problem with porn pictures being the default screensaver (unless my mother saw it...) - as i know how to find the screensaver control dialog. I would just find it stupid, childish, and generally looking like something two teenage boys had programmed at night. We don't want Linux/RH/Fedora/etc to look like something programmed by two High School students, we want it to look like the rock solid, professional piece of software it *IS*. Something that just does what it should do, and nothing else. Something you can thrust. > I don't want a distribution I work on censored b/c someone is afraid > their screensaver might offend a customer. > If people are concerned about 'decency' in certain packages then let > them add a distribution-nanny package that cleans these things up. > > yum install frightened_of_naughty_words.noarch > or "yum install naugty_words" Kyrre. -- Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
