On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 02:33, Ray Strode wrote: > On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 21:27 -0300, Steven Garrity wrote: > > So, as this thread illustrates, there are plenty of opinions on the > > screensavers. > > > > Perhaps someone with the authority/ability can make a call on this based > > on the various options floated on this thread and go ahead with it. > So what I'm going to end up doing is making the base xscreensaver > package have a small number of screensavers, and then have an additional > package for the more fancy ones. Have you already decided how to tackle the "how can xscreensaver hacks packages be dropped in simply" problem I outlined in one of my last posts? I've already messed around with adding hacks to /usr/X11R6/lib/app-defaults/XScreensaver (in the course of packaging rss-glx for Fedora) and this is neither fun and nor reliable ;-) -- you need to deal with any of {xscreensaver base package,random xscreensaver extra hacks package} being {installed,removed,updated}. I'd vote very much for some /etc/xscreensaver/hacks.d directory where extra hacks pacvkages can simply drop their configuration. Nils -- Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759 PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list