I think I through a monkey wrench in the discussion when I brought up that my jobsite requires a non-blank screen saver to be running on all platforms that are powered up. Of course because of this, we also can't take advantage of power management since that would result in a blank screen as well. Jim Powell L3 Communications GSI Senior Scientist/Engineer AV-8B Weapons Integration james.f.powell@xxxxxxxx <mailto:james.f.powell@xxxxxxxx> (760)939-9089 > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-desktop-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:fedora-desktop-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Nils > Philippsen > Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 8:57 > To: Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop > Subject: Re: Screensavers in FC3 > > > On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 14:20, Steven Garrity wrote: > > There was some talk a few months back about trimming down the > > screensavers in Fedora Core to a more sane number. > > > > First, there was the issue of 3D screensavers bogging down > machines that > > couldn't handle them: > > > https://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-desktop-list/2003-D > ecember/msg00088.html > > > > Then, I floated a proposal to pare down the included screensavers: > > > https://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-desktop-list/2004-F > ebruary/msg00002.html > > > > Then, Bill Nottingham had my favourite proposal yet for the > > screensavers: > > > https://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-desktop-list/2004-F ebruary/msg00006.html > > Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com> wrote: > > > > xscreensaver - blank only, core > > xscreensaver-extras - everything else > > > > Simple, clean, avoids flamewars. > > > > Has there been any progress on this? Is it too late to do something for FC3? >From my POV this whole issue is 80% rather trivial (packaging) with 20% coding that needs to be done before that can be the case: - xscreensaver needs to revert to "blank screen" if the user has chosen anything other than {disable screen saver, blank screen}, likewise xscreensaver-demo (which should rather be xscreensaver-config, ...-prefs, ...) should only let you enable or disable blanking in that case - xscreensaver needs another means than X11 resources to let the preferences tool know about the installed hacks, messing around with /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults/XScreenSaver is very cumbersome and bug-prone. Something like a directory /etc/xscreensaver/hacks.d where packages could just drop in small files describing their hacks would be best IMO Both of these are not that trivial and would need to be accepted upstream down the road -- we don't want to maintain such patches forever Nils -- Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759 PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011 -- Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
