On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 11:08, Steven Garrity wrote: > Havoc Pennington wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 12:24, Mariano Draghi wrote: > > > >>I believe it has to do with the fact that the "official" or "standard" > >>MIME/type for the RPM extension is "Real Media" something. > >>So at some point it was decided to leave the .rpm files without > >>asociation (an asociation with "Install Packages" would be non-standard, > >>and an asociation with Real Media Player would be a mistake in a > >>rpm-based distribution as FC2) > > > > That can't be right - we should be able to use sniffing anyhow, or at > > least associate the ".arch.rpm" extension if not plain ".rpm" > > Should I file a bug on this? > Yeah, presumably vs. system-config-packages Havoc
