On Wednesday 05 May 2004 22:11, Will Cohen wrote:
> I work on performance tools at Red Hat. I have been told there is
> interest in tuning the desktop to improve performance. I have a number
> of questions to help identify the work needed in this area. I would be
> interested in any answers that people have for the following questions.
>
>
> What is the set of software in the "Desktop" (executable names and/or
> RPM packages)?
>
>From my point of view rpm -qa | grep kde would give a good starting list
+ emacs
+ java
+ mozilla (now seems faster than firefox strangely enough)
> What specific performance problems have people observed so far in the
> desktop? For example heavy CPU or memory usage by particular
> applications. Another example long latency between event and resulting
> action.
heavy disk usage kill my machines performance, I work on a laptop with a fast
CPU and plenty of ram.
>
> What metrics were used to gauged the effect of software changes on
> performance?
One point I will note is that KDE seems a lot speedier now I've upgraded to
3.2 line.
Dave.
>
> What performance tools have people used so far to identify performance
> problems with desktop applications?
>
> How well or poorly did the performance tools work in identifying the
> performance problem?
>
> Were benchmarks used to test performance of desktop applications? If
> so, what type of benchmarks were used (e.g. micro benchmarks or
> measuring the amount of time required to do something in an
> application program)?
>
> Were the benchmarks runnable in batch mode without human assistance?
>
>
> -Will
--
Dr. David Holden. (Systems Developer)
Crystallography Journals Online: <http://journals.iucr.org>
Thanks in advance:-
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See: <http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html>
UK Privacy (R.I.P) : http://www.stand.org.uk/commentary.php3
Public GPG key available on request.
-------------------------------------------------------------
