> 6. Daniel Veillard is hacking on a per-user daemon to replace > the FAM system daemon, primarily motivated by SELinux > (FAM system daemon lets you violate the security boundaries) What is it that fam is supposed to achieve? I know it does file change notification but I've never noticed a change in system behavior from when it is off or on. Is Daniel's work on line somewhere? > > 7. The gconf multiple login question, which everyone is already > familiar with sadly... Mark was having a look. What's been mark's take on this? Last thing I heard some discussion of application configuration storage daemon - possibly not gconfd based - but that sounded like deep in the future. thanks for the info. -sv
