On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 20:34, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jens Knutson (jensknutson@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > http://lists.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2003-December/msg00017.html > > > > So anyway, yeah, GNOME recognizes the problems with xscreensaver, and at > > some point, we'll get a nice replacement. > > However, in the points listed there; there's not really > that much there that doesn't already exist in xscreensaver > (using generic hacks, and having a lib that makes writing some > stuff easier - the lib just isn't packaged as such.) That doesn't really matter - hell, the code from Sven may end up just being an xcreensaver fork. The point is more that the project would be under GNOME control. This is not to knock Jamie or his project, they just have different goals; it's quite unlikely that Jamie will want to make the necessary changes to xscreensaver (like trimming the fat of some of the "lame" or problematic screensavers, changing the configuration GUI, etc) to make it the really great, user-oriented (as opposed to geek-oriented) screensaver that GNOME needs. - jck -- "To turn $100 into $110 is work. To turn $100 million into $110 million is inevitable" -- Edgar Bronfman
